Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Гангстер одним ударом расправился с туристом в Таиланде и попал на видео18:08
，推荐阅读safew官方版本下载获取更多信息
丰田1月销量同比增长4.8%，创历年1月销量新高
5年过渡，我国圆满完成巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果同乡村振兴有效衔接目标任务，牢牢守住了不发生规模性返贫致贫底线。
Индийские компании пересматривают нефтяные контракты с Россией из-за новых санкций США. Что об этом известно?23 октября 2025